Jack and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Monaco street signs
Jack Yan: the Persuader blog
  Click here to go to home pageWhat I stand forMy stuffWhat others have recently saidMeet some of the coolest folks I knowDrop me a line Visit my workplace
> My stuff > The Persuader Blog


Ford may sell Jaguar, with Land Rover as sweetener 

may sell , with once-profitable as a sweetener, and retain minority shareholdings and technical links with both—if reports surrounding Kenneth Leet’s recommendations are correct. And Ford will now have to consider if it is going to be in for the , or react as is so prone to doing on a quarterly basis.
   I advocate sticking it out, if I were on the Ford board. These are worth something to Ford, and allow it to have across market sectors. But, as so often happens, American investment groups don’t seek the long term. Not after so many years of losses. I wouldn’t blame them so harshly this time.
   The Observer’s report on Sunday made some sense when Julian Rendell wrote:

   Despite its troubles, Jaguar still offers a huge amount to Ford. Alongside Bentley, Rolls-Royce, Aston Martin and Land-Rover, it is one of the few British car marques to retain credibility. The still offers plenty of to exploit; its designers and engineers know saloons and sports cars inside out; its factories are relatively new; and there is a dramatic new sports saloon due to launch around 2008.
   The question is whether Ford wants to be around to take advantage of all this, or whether it needs to sell up quickly to offset the worsening position in North America.
   A well-placed industry expert in the UK is convinced a sale is planned. ‘I know they will sell it,’ he says. ‘It is quite logical. Jaguar has never made money and the prognosis doesn’t look good.’
   It is true that in 17 years of Ford ownership, Jaguar has made money in only a handful of years. In that time it has absorbed around $5bn of —at least $1bn of that going into emergency recapitalisations.
   But those figures don’t tell the whole story. It could be argued that Jaguar has been starved of investment. Over 17 years, an average of about £200m a year is not enough to keep pace with rivals such as Mercedes-Benz, BMW and Audi, whose model ranges now dwarf Jaguar’s. And, crucially, Jaguar’s German competitors have had diesel engines for years. Jaguar only got its first diesel in 2003.

   Someone will benefit from all this. Renault was linked to Jaguar not long ago, and now is. If the east is rising, then I would not be surprised, and the Korean company might more than readily use Jaguar’s and Land Rover’s technology in its more humble offerings. It might not even need deep pockets as so much of Jaguar’s future models are already sorted. The X-type’s R&D is advanced, and the S-type is nearly ready.
   Hyundai emerged when a British Leyland boss went over there to help South Korea start on automobile manufacture. Nissan got its start with building Austins under licence. MG and Rover are in Red Chinese hands. The east may now benefit not from technology, but from England’s great brands. It is almost the next logical flow of assets as the region strengthens further and finds itself needing to compete more aggressively in .
   Whether there is any strategic fit remains open to question—and Hyundai itself has not shown itself to be that conscious of , in its 30-plus-year history. The question may well be greater than that of capital.
   The same issue might be plaguing automaker right now, but it does have former Ford of Europe COO Martin Leach in its employ.

Del.icio.us tags: Jaguar Ford Land Rover transfer technology brands Hyundai branding luxury brands premium corporate culture capitalization investment Wall Street GAZ
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Comments: Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link




Entries from 2006 to the end of 2009 were done on the Blogger service. As of January 1, 2010, this blog has shifted to a Wordpress installation, with the latest posts here.
   With Blogger ceasing to support FTP publishing on May 1, I have decided to turn these older pages in to an archive, so you will no longer be able to enter comments. However, you can comment on entries posted after January 1, 2010.

Quick links

Surf to the online edition of Lucire
  • More ramblings at the Lucire Insider blog
  • The Medinge Group
  • Jack Yan for Mayor
  • My Facebook page
  • Follow me on Twitter
  • My Vkontakte page
  • Book me for public speaking
  • Contact JY&A Consulting on business projects
  • Check out fonts from JY&A Fonts
  • Add feeds

    Add feed to Bloglines

    Individual JY&A and Medinge Group blogs

  • Lucire: Insider
  • Summer Rayne Oakes
  • The Medinge Group press room
  • Detective Marketing
  • Amanda van Kuppevelt
  • Delineate Brandhouse
  • Paolo Vanossi
  • Nigel Dunn
  • Pameladevi Govinda
  • Endless Road
  • Avidiva news
  • Johnnie Moore’s Weblog
  • Steal This Brand Too
  • The Beyond Branding Blog
  • Ton’s Interdependent Thoughts
  • Partum Intelligendo
  • Right Side up
  • Headshift
  • Goiaba Brazilian Music
  • Jack Yan on Tumblr (brief addenda)

  • +

    Previous posts

  • Finding Smart money by not Dodging Colt
  • Managing the personal brand
  • A new internet sport
  • In national plan, Malaysia aims to brand
  • And now, Red China blocks Feedburner feeds
  • Brands versus commodities
  • Snakes on a Plane: 13 days to go
  • Kiwi TV through British eyes
  • The person and the persona
  • Jaguars can’t leap when their paws are tied

  • Donate

    If you wish to help with my hosting costs, please feel free to donate.