21.8.06 Snakes on a Plane is number one—thanks to the blogosphere
Snakes on a Plane is the number one movie in the US, and its Google references surpassed 47 million—which does make it a certified hit. I know earlier I had my doubts, especially when the Google references started falling and interest began waning—and we wondered if August 18 would ever come around. But as I wrote last week, the fans did come back, and there were events to promote the film after all. Now it has more internet references than some other number-one hits I had been keeping an eye on.
Here in New Zealand, the première was given as a fourth-quarter date but I notice that that no longer applies. Snakes premières August 25. And what of the movie? The reviews aren’t great, but Samuel L. Jackson is enjoying himself in the publicity machine, including a Rats in a Deli spoof in Rupert Jee’s Hello Deli on The Late Show with David Letterman. The fans are enjoying themselves in this phenomenon, which, with hindsight, will be one of those fads that people a generation from now will wonder what we were on. Like the Moonies, the Pet Rock or Slime. What is sad, however, is that old media are quick to criticize the internet, blogs and citizen media. From The New York Times today: “Snakes,” which opened for midnight screenings on Thursday, drew a respectable number of fans on Friday, but fell off 18 percent on Saturday and was expected to fall off still more on Sunday, as have other horror films in the past. “We see that Internet interest in a movie doesn’t necessarily translate to good box office,” said Paul Dergarabedian, president of Exhibitor Relations, a company that tracks the box office. “To some, the marketing was more exciting than the movie. Everyone was talking about the movie. But you have to convert that talk into moviegoing, otherwise it’s just talk.” My view: don’t blame the internet. There are many reasons the billings fell off, and one should ask how much New Line spent on promotions. The newspaper says $20 million in addition to fan support. I would argue that it wasn’t that hefty for what is a horror film—hardly mainstream. In fact, because of its genre, the fact Snakes reached number one illustrates the opposite of The New York Times’ conclusion. The bloggers did have a say, and they drove a lot more people to Snakes than we would normally expect—ten to one non-horror fans went along. Posted by Jack Yan, 11:28 Comments:
Sad to say that it scored more Google references than it did dollars. I so wanted it to blow every other blockbuster out of the water if only to prove that these mega-ad campaigns were a thing of the past.
I did, too. Maybe the smaller number is also due to the fact the blogosphere is global, and we are talking about US receipts only. But I do have to lay some blame at New Line’s feet as I believe the marketing could have been more grass roots—remember, Snakes suffered declines in Google hits during the year, when I believe they should have continually risen through some marketing initiatives.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
|
NoteEntries from 2006 to the end of 2009 were done on the Blogger service. As of January 1, 2010, this blog has shifted to a Wordpress installation, with the latest posts here.With Blogger ceasing to support FTP publishing on May 1, I have decided to turn these older pages in to an archive, so you will no longer be able to enter comments. However, you can comment on entries posted after January 1, 2010. Quick linksAdd feedsIndividual JY&A and Medinge Group blogs+ Previous posts |
||
DonateIf you wish to help with my hosting costs, please feel free to donate. |
|||
Copyright ©200210 by Jack Yan & Associates. All rights reserved. Photograph of Jack Yan by Chelfyn Baxter. |