Jack and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Monaco street signs
Jack Yan: the Persuader blog
  Click here to go to home pageWhat I stand forMy stuffWhat others have recently saidMeet some of the coolest folks I knowDrop me a line Visit my workplace
> My stuff > The Persuader Blog


I wish I was joking 

You could never make in , with any rich guy at the helm. Donald says, ‘You’re fired,’ and Martha said, ‘Goodbye,’ but in New Zealand, that would put you at odds with the Relations’ Act 2000.
   I went to law school and I never saw a crock of junk like this: a piece of totally geared toward employees, so bosses cannot fire people.
   Not even if they are incompetent.
   Not even if they steal from you.
   You fire someone, the Employment Court is likely going to award the dismissed employee three months’ wages.
   I have never seen a law like this that so offends .
   So, in the New Zealand version of The Apprentice, the star will have to say, ‘I would like to propose that you leave this organization and would like to enter into a consultation process with you, with full legal representation for you. I hope you will accept this proposal.’
   And that, ladies and gentlemen, would be crap television.
   Because it sure as heck makes for crap .
Post a Comment  Links to this post

What?? Businesses in New Zealand can't fire employees? So what do they do when people are clearly incompetent, stealing, etc.? These businesses just have to sit there and accept that kind of behavior? Wow, now that's what I call job security!  
It also makes for higher unemployment because employers are going to be very leery of hiring new people. It also means higher costs as employers are going to have to use expensive screening processes to try to avoid hiring a dud employee as well as what it will cost them to fire a dud employee.  
RSON: I am never hiring a New Zealander as an employee ever again in this country. Never. You have to go through some cockamamie process of warnings for a long time before you can dismiss someone. And the warnings cannot be cumulative unless agreed to, e.g. if you warn someone one day for being an ass to a customer, and the next day you warn the same person for theft, that’s not two warnings. That’s one warning for each offence.
   I have traditionally voted left-of-centre political parties here, but with this law, I have to warn everyone off left-leaning parties! You cannot run businesses with this sort of legislation.
   Ron, you are totally correct. I will contract New Zealanders as independents but I ain’t going to be helping unemployment figures like I tried to do before.
   But you know, employees will always outnumber employers, and the assholes in the Labour government know this.  
Very interesting. I honestly never heard this stuff before...  
Call me an idealistic liberal, but I’ve often found there’s a root cause for these types of things. What scenarios inspired such strong pro-worker mandates? Was there a history of employer abuses? How many employees have suffered job losses because of shady activities from their bosses?  
You're right Jack that employees will always outnumber employers BUT unemployed employees won't keep re-electing a government that doesn't take various steps to help get them employed i.e. look at the frustration with the Schroeder government in Germany. One of the reasons unemployment rates remain so high in Europe is because of the difficulty employers have with firing employees.  
Highjive, it never got that bad here that we employers were landed with a law like that. True, the previous employment legislation was more in favour of employers, because it came into force under a conservative government, but I never heard of serious abuses. Today, all I hear from employers is what a POS the Employment Relations’ Act is.
   Ron, excellent point. New Zealanders tend to be optimists though, so I wonder how long it will take employees to see the writing on the wall.
   I believe the Europeans might have it easier than we do. I can’t imagine it being this bad anywhere! I think even Red Chinese have less job security.
   Bill, thank you for stopping by—I have just visited your blog and found it incredibly interesting.  
Jack - this is amazing to me as well.

It seems it makes the workplace all that more adversarial between employees and employers.

Thanks for venting while you enlarge the conversation!

We'll be watching to see how this "experiment" in New Zealand's marketplace goes.  
Welcome to France and Germany where the same thing applies. But check this - the UK has passed anti-ageism legislation which looks like it might cause a few problems - including problems for goernment.  
Michael, thank you. And Dennis, after what you and Ron posted, I need to add: no wonder their employment record leaves something to be desired. I’m going to have to remember that should we wind up living in France.  
"What scenarios inspired such strong pro-worker mandates? Was there a history of employer abuses"

- um, historically? one good example would be the industrial revolution, which kinda encouraged labour laws. People couldn't like, afford to buy bread even though they worked 40 hours a week for someone who had inherited a business.

I don’t think Highjive was going back that far in his question, Anonymous.  
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link




Entries from 2006 to the end of 2009 were done on the Blogger service. As of January 1, 2010, this blog has shifted to a Wordpress installation, with the latest posts here.
   With Blogger ceasing to support FTP publishing on May 1, I have decided to turn these older pages in to an archive, so you will no longer be able to enter comments. However, you can comment on entries posted after January 1, 2010.

Quick links

Surf to the online edition of Lucire
  • More ramblings at the Lucire Insider blog
  • The Medinge Group
  • Jack Yan for Mayor
  • My Facebook page
  • Follow me on Twitter
  • My Vkontakte page
  • Book me for public speaking
  • Contact JY&A Consulting on business projects
  • Check out fonts from JY&A Fonts
  • Add feeds

    Add feed to Bloglines

    Individual JY&A and Medinge Group blogs

  • Lucire: Insider
  • Summer Rayne Oakes
  • The Medinge Group press room
  • Detective Marketing
  • Amanda van Kuppevelt
  • Delineate Brandhouse
  • Paolo Vanossi
  • Nigel Dunn
  • Pameladevi Govinda
  • Endless Road
  • Avidiva news
  • Johnnie Moore’s Weblog
  • Steal This Brand Too
  • The Beyond Branding Blog
  • Ton’s Interdependent Thoughts
  • Partum Intelligendo
  • Right Side up
  • Headshift
  • Goiaba Brazilian Music
  • Jack Yan on Tumblr (brief addenda)

  • +

    Previous posts

  • Alert for Mr Peter J. Hook
  • Richard Hammond gets better, so BBC threatens to c...
  • Time to save Top Gear
  • A preview of Lucire’s web redesign
  • Get well, Hamster
  • The obesity debate on Good Morning
  • No parodies, we’re French
  • The UK’s top 10 online brands
  • Managing the cat fight
  • A cellphone-free life for five Gen Yers

  • Donate

    If you wish to help with my hosting costs, please feel free to donate.