Jack and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Monaco street signs
Jack Yan: the Persuader blog
  Click here to go to home pageWhat I stand forMy stuffWhat others have recently saidMeet some of the coolest folks I knowDrop me a line Visit my workplace
> My stuff > The Persuader Blog


Lawyers should be nice 

I can’t divulge the company names involved here but it involves a friend of mine running a web site. It has a forum. Copyrighted images were posted there, not that he wished that to happen. Now the owner is on his case, which is fine, as I would be, too, in their shoes.
   They want to know who posted the material (the poster is anonymous, and he doesn’t host his own board). They also want the post to be removed ASAP.
   He wrote back politely to the to ask what he could do to assist and got a fairly nasty reply back. It told him to seek legal advice and it would not comment on the 1976.
   A better solution would have been to advise my friend of how they both could move forward.
   It seemed pretty obvious that the client and lawyer didn’t have a clue on how these forums worked, and my friend does not know that much about copyright law. Perfect: an opportunity to .
   The lawyer could do this without breaching . After all, by working together, they might be able to find a solution to tracking down the anonymous poster. It’s in the client’s best interests. If my friend merely deleted the file as they demanded, both parties would never be able to trace the poster—not without a degree in advanced computing, anyway, or full access to the hosting company’s logs. Right now, that isn’t an option. It’s like asking for a gold-plated toilet: it’s possible, but it isn’t particularly viable.
   My friend could propose a solution such as warnings on his forum that would keep the happy long-term. And the lawyer should agree, if he really was serving his client.
   But no: the approach is the name of the game in the , and it isn’t limited to the .
   We have had to patrol a lot of web sites over the years for our own material, and that of my colleagues. We might learn of an infringing web site, for example. All the “hard” approaches of my colleagues tended to fail, or at least it did not get the result they wanted without raising the blood pressure of all involved.
   We would write in, explaining the situation, how little the original owners made off their work to begin with, and could they please remove certain files?
   Within a few hours I had agreeable responses. Occasionally, they would comment on my colleagues’ approach and how impolite they had been.
   Cooperation and aren’t solutions just for misunderstandings. They can help you on copyright matters.
   All my friend now has is a sour taste with the publishing company’s titles, thereby damaging their . Which is good for me, since the more people know they are run by a bunch of idiots, the happier I’ll be.
   I hope that if we were to ever hire lawyers and take matters out-of-house, we won’t deal with idiots who opt for tactics first. We have a few pretty good ones we use in New York and yes, they do advise me occasionally for free—because now I have become an even more loyal client.
   Sounds to me like this lawyer is getting everyone mad so he has more . I’ll be noting his name to avoid him in the future. He probably watched too much LA Law when he was training.

Del.icio.us tags: law | lawyers | professional conduct | ethics | brands | cooperation | dialogue | copyright | intellectual property | copyright infringement
Post a Comment  Links to this post

It happens. I believe that by present copyright law in the United States, the site can be requested to be taken down. The host could be compelled to comply. It's all rather... draconian.

Lawyers aren't hired to be nice. They are hired to look out for the legal interests of their client - that your friend didn't hear from the person who has the copyright infringement directly is the real problem. That's just poor on the part of the copyright holder, because then there could have been dialogue. But many copyright holders are tired of people doing that on the web... especially if they are using the bandwidth of the server to get the job done.

Now - here's the real catch. If your friend has a disclaimer for his boards that basically states that people are responsible for their own posts, you can pretty much have him to tell the lawyer to pound sand once the copyrighted material is no longer there. There are also privacy laws (except, perhaps, in the United States! LOL). Now, if they are serious about nailing the copyright infringer, they could get a copy of the server logs (I doubt that they would take the server to do that).

Make sure your friend is backing up his server.

Suggest that he comply, within the limits of the privacy agreements and disclaimers he has on his message boards, and also suggest that he get a point of contact to discuss future issues with that is not a lawyer - since, of course, your friend doesn't want to have copyright infringement on his site.

Of course, fighting the PR war with the publishing company might get them to respond without the lawyer. Publicity has a very calming effect on people who make money based on their appearances. Personally, I'd like to know more about this... I want to know which publishing company hires lawyers before they talk to people.

I doubt it's O'Reilly. O'Reilly tends to let people know personally - I found that out when someone was posting copyrighted material from an O'Reilly book at LinuxGazette.com when I was running it - so I immediately took it down and dealt with the person who posted it.  
You are right, Taran, and I did advise my friend to cooperate, explaining some of the things I mentioned in my post. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act in the US could be used in this case, as the host is American—a simple request from the lawyer to the host would have worked, and my friend would be site-less, probably after a warning from that host.
   I still can’t mention the company name: in fact, my friend hasn’t even given me permission to mention this case, which is why I have been vague about everything. But I wanted to get it out of my system this morning.
   I agree that not having dialogue first is piss-poor, and can think of a few cases there, too, including one I am involved in!
   I can say, however, that it’s not O’Reilly. I used to know someone there, too, and I always found them pretty nice. I do know of this other company, and I can say they tend to be highly strung most of the time.  
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link




Entries from 2006 to the end of 2009 were done on the Blogger service. As of January 1, 2010, this blog has shifted to a Wordpress installation, with the latest posts here.
   With Blogger ceasing to support FTP publishing on May 1, I have decided to turn these older pages in to an archive, so you will no longer be able to enter comments. However, you can comment on entries posted after January 1, 2010.

Quick links

Surf to the online edition of Lucire
  • More ramblings at the Lucire Insider blog
  • The Medinge Group
  • Jack Yan for Mayor
  • My Facebook page
  • Follow me on Twitter
  • My Vkontakte page
  • Book me for public speaking
  • Contact JY&A Consulting on business projects
  • Check out fonts from JY&A Fonts
  • Add feeds

    Add feed to Bloglines

    Individual JY&A and Medinge Group blogs

  • Lucire: Insider
  • Summer Rayne Oakes
  • The Medinge Group press room
  • Detective Marketing
  • Amanda van Kuppevelt
  • Delineate Brandhouse
  • Paolo Vanossi
  • Nigel Dunn
  • Pameladevi Govinda
  • Endless Road
  • Avidiva news
  • Johnnie Moore’s Weblog
  • Steal This Brand Too
  • The Beyond Branding Blog
  • Ton’s Interdependent Thoughts
  • Partum Intelligendo
  • Right Side up
  • Headshift
  • Goiaba Brazilian Music
  • Jack Yan on Tumblr (brief addenda)

  • +

    Previous posts

  • Yahoo! aids jailing of civil servant
  • Time to Lego
  • The Economist: don’t ignore the blogs
  • Potential new worlds, at the rate of a blog a seco...
  • A war veteran at 13
  • Chapter One
  • EFT-POS and oil companies are evil
  • New Zealand’s own “extremists”
  • Choosing between India and China
  • The winner fakes it all

  • Donate

    If you wish to help with my hosting costs, please feel free to donate.