Jack and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Monaco street signs
Jack Yan: the Persuader blog
  Click here to go to home pageWhat I stand forMy stuffWhat others have recently saidMeet some of the coolest folks I knowDrop me a line Visit my workplace
> My stuff > The Persuader Blog


They’re corporations, Tom, but not as we know them 

Every time there’s some mess in the regarding the nomination of judges, someone brings up the of the nation and what they intended in the . The Matrix radio station in , (107·5 MHz) has been doing its rounds with of late and it may be worth remembering just what the Founding Fathers thought of .
   As summarized at Norma Sherry’s site:

Before our , the [Americas] were governed by Britain. Two companies, the East India Tea Company and the Hudson Bay Company[,] ramrodded their will upon the businessman and in actuality were the true rulers of the early colonists. As for Great Britain, it was distracted in numerous battles and wars with countries in Europe. Not until its victory in 1763 with France in the Seven Years’ War, or the French and Indian War, did Britain give the [Americas] the full weight of its attention.

   The was a corporate abuser and had Parliament enact laws so it could have a monopoly on tea. With this fresh in mind, the constitutional conventions took place. (The same Company later demanded that in exchange for Chinese tea, it would trade opium rather than currency or metals—and tried to get as many Chinese hooked on drugs as possible. When they could not sail in during the Opium War, the American Forbes family did.)
   While and one other supported the idea of corporations—at least for creating projects for the public good—others opposed it. I hope Ms Sherry permits me to cite a slightly bigger chunk this time (my emphasis):

It is the accumulation of disgust for the mentality that prompted Thomas Jefferson to proclaim, “I hope we shall take warning from the example of England and crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations which dare already to challenge our Government to trial, and bid defiance to the laws of our country”[.]
   Therefore, when our founding fathers deliberated on the text and content of our Constitution, the despicable maneuverings of the East India Tea Company and other British corporations favored high in their collective memories. This new country was going to assure corporations would know their place.
   … In the beginning, and for many years of the , corporations could exist only if they were granted a charter by the state in which they would conduct business.
   … were issued with the combined approval of the and the . … Rules were clearly defined and any deviation would result in the revocation of the charter; likewise, if their operating conditions were unacceptable, this too would result in the loss of their charter. If the corporation was dissolved its assets were divided among its .
   … Incorporated were not permitted to land holdings or make any political contributions or attempt to influence legislation. They could not purchase or own stock in other corporations. They were strictly and explicitly charted for the purpose of serving the .

   To put it in modern parlance, corporations could only exist with a charter and strict . I understand the American was born with such corporations (though one could debate the operating conditions for workers), and when one examines the growth of and , there were notions of , with constant innovation as the means through which that could be achieved.
   So while we dig out and argue the Founding Fathers for everything from filibusters to the appointment of US Cabinet members, we don’t seem to dig them out too often when there are corporate abuses and .
   Yes, the laws have changed since these formative steps, but we ignore their origins at our peril. Just as America was formed because of a chasm between the ruling class and everyday people, some corporations—not just American ones—may cause itself. The battle, this time, will not be fought over nations, but .
   The more word of abuses get out, the more likely will react against the perpetrators. And in some cases, the solutions are so simple: an extra quarter-dollar on a pair of shoes, compliance with basic laws on . For consumers now expect corporations to reflect their , just like they were meant to in the beginning—why else is telling people that it is installing solar panels in some stations and reusing water from its car washes? And if they find out the promise has been broken, wait for it to spread on virally, or for it to appear on . Keep the promise and watch dividends grow, as well as customer bases in unexpected places—the places that one has helped.

Del.icio.us tags: corporations | history | USA | CSR | social responsibility
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Comments: Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link




Entries from 2006 to the end of 2009 were done on the Blogger service. As of January 1, 2010, this blog has shifted to a Wordpress installation, with the latest posts here.
   With Blogger ceasing to support FTP publishing on May 1, I have decided to turn these older pages in to an archive, so you will no longer be able to enter comments. However, you can comment on entries posted after January 1, 2010.

Quick links

Surf to the online edition of Lucire
  • More ramblings at the Lucire Insider blog
  • The Medinge Group
  • Jack Yan for Mayor
  • My Facebook page
  • Follow me on Twitter
  • My Vkontakte page
  • Book me for public speaking
  • Contact JY&A Consulting on business projects
  • Check out fonts from JY&A Fonts
  • Add feeds

    Add feed to Bloglines

    Individual JY&A and Medinge Group blogs

  • Lucire: Insider
  • Summer Rayne Oakes
  • The Medinge Group press room
  • Detective Marketing
  • Amanda van Kuppevelt
  • Delineate Brandhouse
  • Paolo Vanossi
  • Nigel Dunn
  • Pameladevi Govinda
  • Endless Road
  • Avidiva news
  • Johnnie Moore’s Weblog
  • Steal This Brand Too
  • The Beyond Branding Blog
  • Ton’s Interdependent Thoughts
  • Partum Intelligendo
  • Right Side up
  • Headshift
  • Goiaba Brazilian Music
  • Jack Yan on Tumblr (brief addenda)

  • +

    Previous posts

  • A time for acceptance
  • Lawyers should be nice
  • Yahoo! aids jailing of civil servant
  • Time to Lego
  • The Economist: don’t ignore the blogs
  • Potential new worlds, at the rate of a blog a seco...
  • A war veteran at 13
  • Chapter One
  • EFT-POS and oil companies are evil
  • New Zealand’s own “extremists”

  • Donate

    If you wish to help with my hosting costs, please feel free to donate.