JackYan.com
Jack and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Monaco street signs
Jack Yan: the Persuader blog
  Click here to go to home pageWhat I stand forMy stuffWhat others have recently saidMeet some of the coolest folks I knowDrop me a line Visit my workplace
> My stuff > The Persuader Blog


3.2.06

How to stop the matrix resetting itself 

When we talk about , I occasionally think about history, because we have been here before. The last great era of globalization was at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries, and one company that rode that wave was Singer, who got its into most of the world. I imagine still use some Singers.
   But the last time we had globalization, we still wound up trying to kill each other in . Now we still maintain the idea that will conquer all—after all, that was the same theory behind the and the .
   If we aren’t that much smarter as creatures this time round, what makes us think we’ll avoid annilhating ourselves?
   It might pay to examine why we wound up corrupting the last time. Then, it was and : companies wanted to make use of their trade to line their pockets. Familiar enough. In some cases, it was about supplying things the other nation did not want: forcing to accept , rather than silver, for example. Now it’s about paying workers 25 cents an hour—if that. Countries built their empires to support , distancing themselves from the individual voices that were being trampled on. The rise of wasn’t about an ideology: it was about creating a voice that could be heard against the . These days we choose to ignore folks dying of diseases that are curable, but the isn’t there to help them.
   I support the idea of one planet, one people (shall we abbreviate this 1P1P?)—I love the idea that someone in Syria might be my neighbour because the internet makes that all possible. And Skype, and even cheaper air travel. Globalization—if it weren’t such a word shamed by WTO protesters—would be my mantra.
   I would imagine most people feel the same way: that there is no harm in thinking of someone in another country as a fellow human being. The first thaw in the probably happened not with or , but with Phil Donahue, hosting a show where he connected, via satellite, everyday people from the and the Soviet Union, in their respective nations’ studios. One Russian said, ‘I would like to come over there and shake your hand.’ And we realized our “enemy” was much rather like us.
   Wherever you go, there is a version of “the ”, whether you’re in Washington state or in the Palestinian territories. Everyone just wants to feel fulfilled and do their part in life.
   So what can be different? What can we do so we don’t reset the Matrix and wind up 100 years behind our time?
   This time, most of us have a voice. The internet, in the west at least, has been the great leveller. It might even become that in some régimes where it is gradually expanding: , , . But it is up to the west to make the first move, to set a pattern about the ’s usage, since we’ve had it longer.
   In my earlier post I offered the notion that the was a reflection of the real one, with the same concerns. But why does it have to be? Why not create, with Web 2·0, a world where the promise of a single planet can be fulfilled and not wait till Web 3·0 or when we start another war?
   Through the web, we can unite individual buyers and sellers and , breaking them out of the state structures that have so far prevented them from contacting and benefiting one another.
   While we are still bound by the laws of each nation, we can begin with very simple tasks. Merely contacting someone else and offering help would be a start. Forming groups using the web—nothing new, mind you—is another thing we can do. But the difference I am writing about is an attitudinal one: for the time being we are making one-on-one changes. However, if each of us sees each connection as one for our , can the changes become greater?
   For instance, most of you reading this blog will have a contact in a foreign country, probably, say, through LinkedIn. We have, for instance, an idea for a business that we might already be doing in our nation. How about this: why not give them the same techniques and see where they wind up? Don’t charge them a until they are on their own two feet, and then make it a reasonable percentage.
   My friend Denis Kenward, whom I met when interviewing him for , just flew off to to teach artisans on two -affected islands his techniques for doing made from shells. Right now, the Indians have the machinery but do not know how to use them in order to create the effects on Denis’s pieces. Instead, they are doing each piece by hand and spending a day. Denis has gone to show them how he makes his works in 10 minutes.
   The man is getting next to nothing financially but the reward must be huge. I don’t think he’s going to be after a royalty, but it is a small, internet-initiated event that can help a lot of people. Sure he had hassles with his visa: that is the real-world element. But the virtual world had the venture all mapped out first, and the just snapped into place. Intention and reality.
   The cynics might fear that the country receiving the intelligence will use it against the originator, but are these nations as selfish and immoral as that? Nine times out of ten—if not 95 out of 100— given is trust returned. We need to be secure about ourselves. We all want cooperation, not suspicion. And the world might just become a better place as a result of that.

Del.icio.us tags: globalization | globalism | philanthropy | free trade | commerce | karma | internet | web | networking
Post a Comment  Links to this post

Comments:
A bit of further reading at Global Issues, by Anup Shah, on globalization here. This entry is dated June 20, 2005.  
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

 

 

Note

Entries from 2006 to the end of 2009 were done on the Blogger service. As of January 1, 2010, this blog has shifted to a Wordpress installation, with the latest posts here.
   With Blogger ceasing to support FTP publishing on May 1, I have decided to turn these older pages in to an archive, so you will no longer be able to enter comments. However, you can comment on entries posted after January 1, 2010.


Quick links

Surf to the online edition of Lucire
  • More ramblings at the Lucire Insider blog
  • The Medinge Group
  • Jack Yan for Mayor
  • My Facebook page
  • Follow me on Twitter
  • My Vkontakte page
  • Book me for public speaking
  • Contact JY&A Consulting on business projects
  • Check out fonts from JY&A Fonts
  • Add feeds




    Add feed to Bloglines

    Individual JY&A and Medinge Group blogs

  • Lucire: Insider
  • Summer Rayne Oakes
  • The Medinge Group press room
  • Detective Marketing
  • Amanda van Kuppevelt
  • Delineate Brandhouse
  • Paolo Vanossi
  • Nigel Dunn
  • Pameladevi Govinda
  • Endless Road
  • Avidiva news
  • Johnnie Moore’s Weblog
  • Steal This Brand Too
  • The Beyond Branding Blog
  • Ton’s Interdependent Thoughts
  • Partum Intelligendo
  • Right Side up
  • Headshift
  • Goiaba Brazilian Music
  • Jack Yan on Tumblr (brief addenda)

  • +

    Previous posts

  • Googling Jesus Christ, communist style
  • Counterpoint: Al Qaeda is weakening
  • What’s brown, yellow and Kiwi?
  • The reinvention of marketing: one simple idea
  • The language of life
  • Beyond the State of the Union ’06
  • The BB is sleeping
  • Get your Snakes on a Plane here
  • Tackling Wal-mart
  • Dr Martin Luther King on branding (sort of)


  • Donate

    If you wish to help with my hosting costs, please feel free to donate.